[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Contentful
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

44

across 1018 prompts

AI Share of Voice

44%

across 995 prompts

Category Visibility

#1

in Headless CMS · of 28

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
616 category
Cited54%332/616
Share of voice45%avg
Engine consensus64%of engines
Competitors18.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited79%11/14
Share of voice79%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Contentful is visible in

3
  • Headless CMS1 of 28→
  • Web CMS1 of 49→
  • Content & Knowledge7 of 147→

Executive summary

Contentful is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "What is the best headless CMS software?" and "How does Contentful compare to Sanity?" because it has strong third-party review authority (G2) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Contentful vs. Storyblok). The single highest-ROI fix is to expand first-party, brand-led comparison coverage for the exact competitor set (Contentstack, Sanity, Strapi, Hygraph) and ensure structured evaluation content (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) is crawlable so AI engines can reliably cite it for "How does Contentful compare to Contentstack?" and "How much does Contentful cost?".

Based on audit of contentful.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy