[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Hygraph
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

19

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

40

across 182 prompts

AI Share of Voice

40%

across 182 prompts

Category Visibility

#8

in Headless CMS · of 28

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
101 category
Cited37%37/101
Share of voice23%avg
Engine consensus51%of engines
Competitors31.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Hygraph is visible in

1
  • Headless CMS8 of 28→

Executive summary

Hygraph is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “best headless CMS” and “Hygraph vs Contentful” because it has strong G2 review volume (718 reviews) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., Hygraph vs Contentful). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen/verify AI-crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure technical AEO coverage (SSR + robots/llms.txt) so pricing and comparison evidence is reliably extractable.

Based on audit of hygraph.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy