AI Visibility
measured70/100
Frequently Cited · in Headless CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals19/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
59
across 195 prompts
AI Share of Voice
59%
across 195 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Headless CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Hygraph is visible in
1Executive summary
Hygraph is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries like “best headless CMS” and “Hygraph vs Contentful” because it has strong G2 review volume (718 reviews) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., Hygraph vs Contentful). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen/verify AI-crawlable structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage for evaluation queries) and ensure technical AEO coverage (SSR + robots/llms.txt) so pricing and comparison evidence is reliably extractable.
Based on audit of hygraph.com · May 6, 2026