Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Note-Taking

The note-taking category reveals a clear hierarchy where Notion leads as the purpose-built solution, capturing nearly 70% shortlist consideration across all models. Traditional productivity suites Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace maintain strong positions through bundled offerings, while Atlassian and emerging players like Coda compete in the 30% range. The uniform model diversity of 4 across top brands indicates genuine cross-model consensus rather than single-model bias, suggesting these rankings reflect robust market positioning.

179 discovery queries · 243 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 179 buyer-style "Note-Taking" queries

0%23%46%70%93%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces61%67%74%81%87%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Note-Taking sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Notion
10/10
2Microsoft
5/10
3Default
5/10
4Google Workspace
4/10
5ClickUp
4/10
1Notion
6/6
2Coda
6/6
3Microsoft
6/6
4Google Workspace
4/6
5ClickUp
4/6
1Notion
6/6
2Plan
6/6
3Microsoft
6/6
4Coda
4/6
5ClickUp
4/6
1Microsoft
5/5
2Notion
4/5
3Plan
4/5
4Confluence
4/5
5Google Workspace
4/5
1Notion
4/4
2Zotero
4/4
3Scrivener
3/4
4Default
2/4
5Coda
2/4
1Notion
4/4
2Goodnotes
4/4
3Microsoft
4/4
4Google Workspace
4/4
5Default
3/4
1Notion
4/4
2Microsoft
3/4
3Google Workspace
2/4
4TickTick
2/4
5Stable
1/4
1Confluence
4/4
2Notion
4/4
3Plan
3/4
4Central
3/4
5Microsoft
2/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · note-taking

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 9/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08152330Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 9/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Note-Taking?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Note-Taking leaderboard →