Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Note-Taking

The note-taking category shows consolidation around two paradigms: modern, flexible workspace tools (Notion at 69%, Obsidian at 55%) that emphasize linking and customization, versus established productivity ecosystems (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace) that bundle note-taking with broader collaboration features. Evernote Teams' 54% shortlist rate suggests the legacy dedicated note-taker still competes, while Atlassian and Coda represent the 'notes as databases' approach. Maximum model diversity (4) across top brands indicates genuine feature differentiation rather than commoditization.

179 discovery queries · 247 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 22, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 179 buyer-style "Note-Taking" queries

10%26%43%60%77%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces70%74%78%82%86%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Note-Taking sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Notion
10/10
2Evernote
8/10
3Obsidian
7/10
4Microsoft
5/10
5Otter.ai
4/10
1Notion
6/6
2Confluence
6/6
3Coda
6/6
4Otter.ai
6/6
5Fireflies.ai
6/6
1Notion
6/6
2Evernote
6/6
3Microsoft
6/6
4Coda
4/6
5Obsidian
4/6
1Microsoft
5/5
2Notion
4/5
3Confluence
4/5
4Google Workspace
4/5
5Fireflies.ai
3/5
1Obsidian
4/4
2Notion
4/4
3Zotero
4/4
4Roam
4/4
5Class
3/4
1Notion
4/4
2Obsidian
4/4
3Goodnotes
4/4
4Notability
4/4
5Microsoft
4/4
1Notion
4/4
2Obsidian
4/4
3Roam
4/4
4Evernote
4/4
5Bear
3/4
1Confluence
4/4
2Notion
4/4
3Obsidian
3/4
4Microsoft
2/4
5Atlassian
2/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · note-taking

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 5/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08152330Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 5/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Note-Taking?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Note-Taking leaderboard →