AI Visibility
measured52/100
Frequently Cited · in Headless CMS
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
22
across 336 prompts
AI Share of Voice
22%
across 336 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Headless CMS
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Kontent.ai is visible in
2Executive summary
Kontent.ai is already highly citable for evaluation-stage queries because it has a strong G2 presence (194 reviews) and first-party comparison pages like “Kontent.ai vs Contentful.” The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured-data coverage for AI evaluation queries (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) so AI Overviews and LLMs can reliably extract pricing, integrations, and “vs” answers from kontent.ai pages rather than falling back to third parties.
Based on audit of kontent.ai · May 20, 2026