AI Visibility
measured67/100
Frequently Cited · in Proposal & CPQ
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals66/100
Solid fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
53
across 393 prompts
AI Share of Voice
52%
across 369 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Proposal & CPQ
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Qwilr is visible in
2Executive summary
Qwilr is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong G2 authority (883 reviews, 4.6★) and first-party comparison content like “Qwilr vs. PandaDoc” plus a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit tiers. The biggest remaining citation risk is structured-data/AI-crawl readiness (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/AggregateRating) and missing/weak secondary signals (TrustRadius/Gartner Peer Insights/YouTube) that AI engines use to diversify sources for “best alternatives” and “how does it work” prompts.
Based on audit of qwilr.com · Apr 1, 2026