Subcategory · AI Citation Index
Warehouse Management (WMS)
SAP, Blue Yonder, and Oracle own WMS shortlists; tier-two consensus collapses into long-tail 33-brand fragmentation.
163 discovery queries · 255 head-to-heads · refreshed Oct 21, 2026
Discovery stage
The shortlist
Across 163 buyer-style "Warehouse Management (WMS)" queries
sap.com claims 58% shortlist rate across 163 prompts, edging Blue Yonder (56%) and oracle.com (56%). Manhattan Associates (52%) and netsuite.com (51%) round out the top five, while Extensiv drops to 35% — a sharp cliff after the legacy ERP-anchored leaders. The 33-brand roster reflects deep vertical and deployment splits AI models struggle to rank coherently.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Get weekly AI visibility changes for Warehouse Management (WMS) sent to your inbox.
Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.
Signal by intent
By topic
Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.
Evaluation stage
Head-to-head
How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100
SAP, Blue Yonder, Oracle, and Infor tie at 44 average evaluation score across 26 head-to-head comparisons each. netsuite.com scores 41 in 24 matchups; Manhattan Associates and Fishbowl each score 36. The median brand scores just 7, exposing a winner-takes-all dynamic where ERP-integrated platforms dominate perceived fit.
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.
Brands to know
In this category
Logiwa
Scores 65 and posts the steepest climb (+48 delta). Cloud-native 3PL focus differentiates it from ERP incumbents in e-commerce fulfillment queries.
Read brand profile →Blue Yonder
Ties for top evaluation score (44) and holds 56% shortlist rate with 250 mentions. AI planning heritage translates to consistent head-to-head wins against non-ERP WMS.
Read brand profile →Manhattan Associates
52% shortlist rate, 184 mentions, 52 composite score. Pure-play supply-chain DNA keeps it relevant when buyers explicitly exclude ERP bundles.
Read brand profile →Cryotos
Scores 61 despite zero shortlist presence in top-10. Likely surfacing in niche maintenance-integrated warehouse queries that bypass mainstream WMS comparisons.
Read brand profile →RFgen
Scores 43 on mobile data-collection strength. Models cite it when prompts emphasize barcode scanning and real-time inventory sync over full suite orchestration.
Read brand profile →Citation sources
Where AI pulls citations from
575 citations captured across Warehouse Management (WMS) prompt runs.
Vendor pages
114Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors
Independent sources
187Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned
Buyer questions
What AI cites for top Warehouse Management (WMS) questions
Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.
Discovery
Buyers exploring the categoryEvaluation
Buyers comparing optionsWant to know if AI cites your brand for Warehouse Management (WMS)?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →