Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Transportation Management (TMS)

The TMS category exhibits robust consensus with 35 brands recognized and 12 undergoing evaluation, suggesting a maturing but still-evolving market. Leaders like Blue Yonder (56%), Descartes (51%), and Oracle (47% and 45% for distinct offerings) demonstrate strong model agreement at diversity level 4, indicating these brands appear across varied analytical frameworks. However, the complete absence of prompt coverage reveals a critical gap: no selections trace to explicit buyer requirements, meaning all recommendations stem from model inference rather than stated customer needs. This pattern suggests TMS evaluation may be driven more by vendor visibility and feature breadth than by specific use-case alignment.

163 discovery queries · 346 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 163 buyer-style "Transportation Management (TMS)" queries

1%9%17%24%32%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces66%74%82%91%99%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Transportation Management (TMS) sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Descartes
7/7
2SAP
6/7
3Blue Yonder
6/7
4MercuryGate
6/7
5Oracle
5/7
1SAP
4/4
2Oracle
4/4
3Blue Yonder
4/4
4Chain
3/4
5project44
3/4
1SAP
3/3
2MercuryGate
3/3
3project44
3/3
4FourKites
3/3
5Descartes
3/3
1SAP
3/3
2project44
3/3
3FourKites
3/3
4Descartes
3/3
5Blue Yonder
2/3
1SAP
3/3
2Blue Yonder
3/3
3MercuryGate
3/3
4FourKites
3/3
5project44
3/3
1MercuryGate
3/3
2Oracle
3/3
3Blue Yonder
3/3
4Descartes
3/3
5E2open
3/3
1project44
3/3
2FourKites
3/3
3Descartes
3/3
4MercuryGate
3/3
5Blue Yonder
3/3
1project44
3/3
2FourKites
3/3
3Blue Yonder
3/3
4Descartes
2/3
5SAP
2/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · transportation-management

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 18/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08162432Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 18/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

664 citations captured across Transportation Management (TMS) prompt runs.

Vendor pages

144

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

166

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Transportation Management (TMS) questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Transportation Management (TMS)?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Transportation Management (TMS) leaderboard →