AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Warehouse Management (WMS)
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 150 prompts
AI Share of Voice
9%
across 142 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Warehouse Management (WMS)
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories PULPO WMS is visible in
1Executive summary
PULPO WMS is already highly citable for evaluation and conversion prompts because it has a strong G2 presence (31 reviews, 4.8★) and publicly accessible pricing with explicit plan tiers (e.g., €590/month and €1,290/month). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison coverage: the domain appears to rely heavily on G2 for competitor comparisons (e.g., G2 Compare pages exist), while first-party “[PULPO WMS] vs ShipHero/Extensiv 3PL Warehouse Manager/Logiwa/Deposco” pages were not found on pulpowms.com during live checks.
Based on audit of pulpowms.com · Aug 29, 2026