[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/PULPO WMS
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

1

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

9

across 142 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 142 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
71 category
Cited3%2/71
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors14.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories PULPO WMS is visible in

1
  • Warehouse Management (WMS)not yet measured→

Executive summary

PULPO WMS is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has a high-signal G2 presence (4.8/5 from 30 reviews) and publicly crawlable pricing with explicit tiers. The biggest risk for AI shortlists is missing/unclear first-party evaluation assets (notably SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data and first-party comparison pages), which reduces the chance the brand is cited for “best/alternatives” and “vs” queries.

Based on audit of pulpowms.com · Jun 9, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy