AEO Score
63
Growing Presence
Avg Prompt Score
93
across 557 prompts
AI Share of Voice
94%
across 541 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Manhattan Associates is visible in
1Executive summary
manh.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 seller page shows 52 reviews with a 4.0/5 average) and first-party, brand-led comparison pages (e.g., “Manhattan Active Transportation Management vs. Blue Yonder TMS”). The single highest-ROI fix is to improve crawlable pricing + structured product schema (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) so AI can answer “pricing” and “integration/evaluation” prompts directly from manh.com rather than relying on third parties.
Based on audit of manh.com · May 7, 2026