AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
11
across 92 prompts
AI Share of Voice
0%
across 76 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in its category
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories SAP is visible in
1Executive summary
sap.com is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for enterprise ERP/CRM/analytics queries because it has strong third-party authority signals (e.g., Gartner Peer Insights profile exists and TrustRadius has SAP product review pages). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage “SAP vs competitor” and “SAP pricing” queries where AI needs crawlable, structured, first-party comparison/pricing content; the highest-ROI fix is to publish/ensure SSR-first-party evaluation pages (brand-led comparisons + machine-readable pricing) and add/verify SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data on those pages.
Based on audit of sap.com · Apr 29, 2026