Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Legal Tech

The legal tech landscape demonstrates robust evaluator agreement on core platforms—practice.do and Clio lead with 54% and 52% shortlist rates respectively, while all top brands achieve maximum model diversity (4/4). However, 0% prompt coverage exposes a critical gap: AI models recommend these tools without grounding in actual legal practice scenarios. The 79 consensus brands against only 12 evaluated suggest broad market awareness but shallow comparative analysis, likely driven by brand recognition rather than nuanced understanding of legal workflows like matter management, billing, or document automation.

158 discovery queries · 318 head-to-heads · refreshed Jun 29, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 158 buyer-style "Legal Tech" queries

0%10%19%28%38%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces44%56%68%81%93%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Legal Tech sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Practice
9/9
2Clio
9/9
3PracticePanther
9/9
4MyCase
8/9
5Imanage
6/9
1NAVEX One
4/8
2Archer
4/8
3LogicGate
4/8
4Recommend
4/8
5Microsoft
4/8
1MyCase
6/6
2Practice
6/6
3Lawmatics
6/6
4PracticePanther
6/6
5Clio
6/6
1Clio
3/4
2Practice
3/4
3MyCase
3/4
4Imanage
2/4
5Netdocuments
2/4
1Relativity
4/4
2Practice
3/4
3Microsoft
2/4
4Brainspace
2/4
5POINT
1/4
1Clio
4/4
2Practice
4/4
3MyCase
4/4
4Smokeball
4/4
5PracticePanther
4/4
1Gavel
4/4
2Westlaw
4/4
3Clio
4/4
4Practice
4/4
5Recommend
4/4
1Ironclad
3/3
2Adobe
2/3
3Juro
2/3
4POINT
2/3
5LinkSquares
2/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · legal-tech

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 13/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08152330Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 13/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

695 citations captured across Legal Tech prompt runs.

Vendor pages

181

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

174

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Legal Tech questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Legal Tech?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Legal Tech leaderboard →