AEO Score
52
Growing Presence
Avg Prompt Score
23
across 907 prompts
AI Share of Voice
23%
across 891 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Imanage is visible in
3Executive summary
imanage.com is a B2B knowledge/document management SaaS with strong third-party review presence (G2 and TrustRadius) and meaningful integration authority (Microsoft AppSource). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage comparison + pricing crawlability: there’s no clearly indexable first-party “[iManage] vs [competitor]” evaluation surface found, and pricing appears to be “contact/book demo” or add-on-only rather than publicly tiered pricing—so AI engines struggle to cite iManage for “pricing” and “vs” shortlist queries. Highest-ROI fix: publish/SSR-index first-party evaluation pages that lead with iManage (e.g., iManage vs NetDocuments/OpenText) and add a crawlable, tiered pricing page (or pricing tables per product) with SoftwareApplication/FAQPage schema.
Based on audit of imanage.com · May 17, 2026