[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Geotab
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

8

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

29

across 339 prompts

AI Share of Voice

29%

across 339 prompts

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
204 category
Cited43%87/204
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus52%of engines
Competitors8.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Geotab is visible in

2
  • Transportation Management (TMS)not yet measured→
  • Warehouse Management (WMS)not yet measured→

Executive summary

Geotab is already well-positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage comparison queries—especially “How does Geotab compare to Samsara?” where first-party content exists. The single highest-ROI fix is to expand first-party comparison coverage beyond Samsara (to Motive, Verizon Connect, Powerfleet, and Lytx) and add crawlable, tiered pricing content so conversion-stage prompts like “How much does Geotab cost?” can be answered from geotab.com rather than only third parties.

Based on audit of geotab.com · May 20, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy