[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Docebo
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

35

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

85

across 560 prompts

AI Share of Voice

85%

across 560 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Learning Management · of 67

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
433 category
Cited92%397/433
Share of voice88%avg
Engine consensus72%of engines
Competitors8.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Docebo is visible in

1
  • Learning Management4 of 67→

Executive summary

Docebo is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 shows ~741+ reviews) and first-party comparison content (e.g., multiple “Docebo vs …” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable evaluation assets on-site—especially structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and any missing schema—so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” from Docebo pages rather than defaulting to third-party sources.

Based on audit of docebo.com · May 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy