AI Visibility
measured70/100
Frequently Cited · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals35/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
88
across 555 prompts
AI Share of Voice
88%
across 555 prompts
Critical Issues
2
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Docebo is visible in
1Executive summary
Docebo is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., G2 shows ~741+ reviews) and first-party comparison content (e.g., multiple “Docebo vs …” pages). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen crawlable evaluation assets on-site—especially structured data (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and any missing schema—so AI engines can reliably extract “what it is / who it’s for / pricing / integrations” from Docebo pages rather than defaulting to third-party sources.
Based on audit of docebo.com · May 6, 2026