[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Sana
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

3

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

17

across 170 prompts

AI Share of Voice

17%

across 170 prompts

Category Visibility

#32

in Learning Management · of 67

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Shortlist Position

2/80

Not Visible · Learning Management Discovery

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
98 category
Cited10%10/98
Share of voice7%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors16.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Sana is visible in

1
  • Learning Management33 of 67→

Your visibility gap

Sana surfaces in 2/80 Learning Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 78 prompts you're missing and how to win them.

Claim Sana →

Executive summary

Sana has strong B2B citation foundations for evaluation queries via high G2 visibility (91 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party pricing that is publicly readable with explicit tiers (e.g., Team $30/user/month, Free $0). The biggest AI citation risk is missing/uncrawlable structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/compare-specific schema) and missing first-party comparison pages for the exact competitor prompts (e.g., “How does Sana compare to Docebo?”).

Based on audit of sanalabs.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy