AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Learning Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
36
across 222 prompts
AI Share of Voice
36%
across 222 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
2/80
Not Visible · Learning Management Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Learning Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Sana is visible in
1Your visibility gap
Sana surfaces in 2/80 Learning Management discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 78 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
Sana has strong B2B citation foundations for evaluation queries via high G2 visibility (91 reviews, 4.8★) and first-party pricing that is publicly readable with explicit tiers (e.g., Team $30/user/month, Free $0). The biggest AI citation risk is missing/uncrawlable structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/compare-specific schema) and missing first-party comparison pages for the exact competitor prompts (e.g., “How does Sana compare to Docebo?”).
Based on audit of sanalabs.com · Jun 4, 2026