Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Agent Frameworks

The agent frameworks category shows clear market consolidation around three purpose-built libraries—LangChain, AutoGen, and CrewAI—each achieving 75-82% shortlist rates and maximum model diversity. LlamaIndex maintains strong presence at 66%, while newer entrants like handoff.ai and base.ai capture modest 23-28% adoption. Traditional automation platforms (UiPath, Rasa) struggle with single-digit shortlist rates, suggesting enterprises prefer native LLM-first architectures over retrofitted RPA tools for multi-step agent workflows.

164 discovery queries · 179 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 164 buyer-style "Agent Frameworks" queries

0%15%30%46%61%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces48%60%72%85%97%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Agent Frameworks sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1LangChain
9/10
2LlamaIndex
8/10
3Handoff
8/10
4AutoGen
7/10
5Base
7/10
1LangChain
7/7
2CrewAI
6/7
3AutoGen
6/7
4Uipath
5/7
5LlamaIndex
4/7
1LangChain
6/6
2AutoGen
6/6
3CrewAI
6/6
4LlamaIndex
5/6
5Microsoft
4/6
1LangChain
6/6
2AutoGen
6/6
3CrewAI
6/6
4LlamaIndex
5/6
5Swarm
5/6
1LangChain
6/6
2LlamaIndex
6/6
3CrewAI
6/6
4AutoGen
6/6
5Facilitate
1/6
1LangChain
5/6
2LlamaIndex
4/6
3AutoGen
4/6
4CrewAI
4/6
5Lindy
3/6
1LangChain
6/6
2AutoGen
5/6
3CrewAI
5/6
4Rasa
4/6
5LlamaIndex
3/6
1LangChain
5/5
2Handoff
5/5
3LlamaIndex
4/5
4Base
3/5
5AutoGen
3/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · agent-frameworks

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 3/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand09182635Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 3/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Agent Frameworks prompt runs.

Vendor pages

286

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

308

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Agent Frameworks questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Agent Frameworks?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Agent Frameworks leaderboard →