AI Visibility
measured64/100
Frequently Cited · in AI Agent Builders
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals86/100
Strong fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
64
across 349 prompts
AI Share of Voice
64%
across 349 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
69/80
Leader · Agent Frameworks Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Agent Builders
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories CrewAI is visible in
2Your visibility gap
CrewAI surfaces in 69/80 Agent Frameworks discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 11 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
CrewAI has strong technical crawlability (public pricing with explicit tiers and an llms.txt-driven docs index) and it already hosts first-party comparison-style content for multi-agent frameworks. The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage competitor comparison coverage for the exact buyer prompts (e.g., “How does CrewAI compare to Zapier?” / “Workato?”) and missing/insufficient structured evaluation schema (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) that AI engines use for “best/compare/pricing” answers.
Based on audit of crewai.com · Jun 6, 2026