Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Vector Databases

Vector databases show a three-way tie at the top of AI attention. Weaviate, Pinecone, and Qdrant each surface in more than 93% of buyer queries about embedding storage and semantic search, visible across all four engines we track. Milvus holds the kingmaker slot — it appears in 92% of discovery prompts and wins more head-to-head comparisons than any other brand (84/100 across 48 matchups), yet trails the consensus trio in raw mention volume. MongoDB is the riser — gaining 13 points month-over-month and scoring 71/100 in head-to-heads despite surfacing in only half of discovery queries. This is a consolidated category with a clear consensus shortlist, but evaluation scores cluster tightly — the gap between the top-rated brand and the median is narrow, signaling that buyers see functional parity across the top five.

157 discovery queries · 466 head-to-heads · refreshed Aug 16, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 157 buyer-style "Vector Databases" queries

Weaviate, Pinecone, and Qdrant form the consensus shortlist — each surfaces in more than 93% of buyer queries about vector databases, visible on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Milvus trails by two points at 92%, then PostgreSQL (with pgvector) drops to 82%. Zilliz Cloud, the managed Milvus service, surfaces in 80% of queries. Elasticsearch and OpenSearch each land in roughly two-thirds of discovery prompts, while Chroma holds 64%.

20%40%60%80%100%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces68%73%77%82%86%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Vector Databases sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Pinecone
10/10
2Qdrant
10/10
3Milvus
10/10
4Weaviate
10/10
5Zilliz Cloud
10/10
1Chroma
10/10
2Qdrant
10/10
3Pinecone
10/10
4PostgreSQL
10/10
5Weaviate
10/10
1Milvus
9/9
2Zilliz Cloud
9/9
3Pinecone
9/9
4Weaviate
9/9
5Qdrant
9/9
1Pinecone
8/8
2Weaviate
8/8
3Qdrant
8/8
4Milvus
8/8
5PostgreSQL
8/8
1Qdrant
8/8
2Chroma
8/8
3Pinecone
8/8
4Milvus
8/8
5Weaviate
8/8
1Chroma
8/8
2Pinecone
8/8
3Qdrant
8/8
4Weaviate
8/8
5Milvus
8/8
1Qdrant
7/7
2Pinecone
7/7
3PostgreSQL
7/7
4Weaviate
7/7
5Milvus
7/7
1Weaviate
7/7
2Qdrant
7/7
3Pinecone
7/7
4Milvus
7/7
5Zilliz Cloud
7/7
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · vector-databases

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 35/100

When buyers ask AI to compare vector databases head-to-head, Weaviate, Qdrant, and Milvus tie at 84/100 — winning most matchups they enter. Pinecone follows at 82/100 across 47 comparison queries. OpenSearch scores 81, Elasticsearch 79. MongoDB wins more head-to-heads than it loses (67/100 across 38 comparisons) despite thin discovery share, while Zilliz Cloud scores 75.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand012243648Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 35/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

1000 citations captured across Vector Databases prompt runs.

Vendor pages

341

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

534

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Vector Databases questions

Buyers ask AI for vector database recommendations by team size and use case — phrasings like 'good vector database options for collaborative research teams', 'top vector database solutions for a one-person startup', 'vector database solutions for local service providers'. A smaller share of queries focuses on evaluation mechanics — how to assess documentation quality, vendor selection checklists, common mistakes when picking a vector database. No pricing or trust-stage prompts appear in the current prompt set; the signal is entirely top-of-funnel exploration and framework-building.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Vector Databases?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Vector Databases leaderboard →