AI Visibility
measured21/100
Emerging · in AI Coding
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals3/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 292 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 292 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Coding
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Lovable is visible in
2Executive summary
Lovable is already strongly positioned for AI app builder evaluation queries because it has a high-citation G2 presence (280 reviews, 4.6★) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page ($25 Pro / $50 Business). The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/unclear first-party structured evaluation surfaces (SoftwareApplication/AggregateRating) and potentially incomplete crawlability signals for AI bots (robots/llms.txt verification), which can reduce eligibility for “best/alternatives” and “how much does it cost” answers.
Based on audit of lovable.dev · Jun 5, 2026