Subcategory · AI Citation Index

OKRs

The OKR software category shows remarkable consensus around a tight cluster of leaders, with WorkBoard, Asana, and Lattice each achieving 64-69% shortlist rates and identical model diversity scores of 4. This uniformity suggests evaluators recognize these platforms as functionally equivalent for goal-setting frameworks, differentiating primarily on workflow integration and organizational context rather than core OKR capabilities. The presence of Microsoft at 48% indicates enterprise buyers consider embedded solutions alongside specialized tools, while the gap between top-tier (WorkBoard at 69%) and mid-tier (Betterworks/Built at 55%) remains modest—reflecting a maturing category where multiple vendors deliver competent implementations.

176 discovery queries · 333 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 176 buyer-style "OKRs" queries

13%27%41%54%68%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces76%80%84%88%92%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for OKRs sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Lattice
8/8
2Built
8/8
3Asana
8/8
4WorkBoard
8/8
5Leapsome
7/8
1Lattice
7/7
2WorkBoard
7/7
3Asana
7/7
4Allyio
7/7
5Betterworks
6/7
1Lattice
5/5
2Betterworks
5/5
3Allyio
5/5
4Asana
5/5
5ClickUp
5/5
1Goals
5/5
2Betterworks
5/5
3Lattice
5/5
415five
5/5
5Asana
5/5
1WorkBoard
4/4
2Built
4/4
3Allyio
4/4
4Lattice
4/4
5Asana
4/4
1Lattice
4/4
2Betterworks
4/4
3WorkBoard
4/4
4Allyio
4/4
5Asana
4/4
1Lattice
4/4
215five
4/4
3WorkBoard
4/4
4Allyio
4/4
5Built
3/4
1Asana
4/4
2Lattice
3/4
3Gtmhub
3/4
4WorkBoard
3/4
5Notion
3/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · okrs

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 16/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand08152330Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 16/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

596 citations captured across OKRs prompt runs.

Vendor pages

272

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

158

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top OKRs questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for OKRs?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full OKRs leaderboard →