[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Asana
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

29

across 3010 prompts

AI Share of Voice

29%

across 3010 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Task Management · of 155

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
2118 category
Cited34%720/2118
Share of voice29%avg
Engine consensus65%of engines
Competitors15.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive8+ / 1~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
27 brand-level
Cited100%27/27
Share of voice85%avg
Engine consensus85%of engines
Competitors3.9avg/cited
Sentimentpositive4+ / 5~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
11 brand-level
Cited100%11/11
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.9avg/cited
Sentimentpositive4+ / 5~ / 0−
💰Conversion
10 brand-level
Cited100%10/10
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.1avg/cited
Sentimentpositive2+ / 4~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Asana is visible in

11
  • Project Management Software1 of 86→
  • Task Management1 of 62→
  • Workflow Automation3 of 131→
  • AI Agentsnot yet measured→
  • Collaborationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Asana is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has very large secondary review footprints (e.g., ~2,988 TrustRadius reviews) and first-party comparison content (e.g., an Asana vs monday.com page). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure B2B evaluation structured data is present and machine-detectable (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating) so AI engines can cite Asana’s own pages for “pricing/integrations/fit” rather than relying primarily on third-party review sources.

Based on audit of asana.com · Jun 24, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy