Subcategory · AI Citation Index
FP&A
The FP&A software market exhibits unusual consensus despite fragmentation, with 8 leading platforms all achieving 49%+ shortlist rates across maximally diverse buyer scenarios. Anaplan, Planful, and Workday Adaptive Planning lead at 65-68%, suggesting buyers evaluate similar capabilities regardless of company size or industry. The presence of newer entrants like Cube and Pigment at 59% alongside established players indicates active market disruption around user experience and integration architecture, while the gap between 60 consensus brands and just 12 evaluated brands points to significant long-tail fragmentation beneath the leading tier.
179 discovery queries · 281 head-to-heads · refreshed Sep 24, 2026
Discovery stage
The shortlist
Across 179 buyer-style "FP&A" queries
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Get weekly AI visibility changes for FP&A sent to your inbox.
Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.
Signal by intent
By topic
Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.
Evaluation stage
Head-to-head
How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 7/100
Hover or click a logo to see brand details
Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.
Trends
Over the last 12 months
Brands to know
In this category
Anaplan
Leads shortlist rate at 68% with maximum buyer diversity, indicating broad appeal across enterprise complexity levels despite reputation as enterprise-focused platform.
Read brand profile →Planful
Achieves 65% shortlist rate with consistent presence across buyer contexts, positioning as viable alternative to both legacy suites and newer challengers.
Read brand profile →Cube
Reaches 59% shortlist rate as newer entrant, suggesting strong product-market fit around Excel-native workflows and modern integration requirements.
Read brand profile →Citation sources
Where AI pulls citations from
660 citations captured across FP&A prompt runs.
Vendor pages
319Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors
Independent sources
199Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned
Buyer questions
What AI cites for top FP&A questions
Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.
Discovery
Buyers exploring the categoryEvaluation
Buyers comparing optionsWant to know if AI cites your brand for FP&A?
Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.
Run an audit →