Subcategory · AI Citation Index

FP&A

FP&A is a fragmented category with no clear consensus pick. Anaplan shows up in every discovery query but surfaces on only four of the five engines we audit; Workday, Cube, Pigment, and NetSuite each appear in 80-94% of buyer queries with cross-engine visibility. In head-to-head comparisons Workday wins more matchups than it loses, while Oracle Planning Cloud and Sage lose more than they win. The category is contested—five brands split discovery share within fifteen points of each other, and head-to-head outcomes haven't yet consolidated around one name.

52 discovery queries · 34 head-to-heads · refreshed May 1, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 52 buyer-style "FP&A" queries

Anaplan shows up in every discovery prompt about FP&A software but misses one of the five engines we audit. Workday, Cube, Pigment, and NetSuite each surface in 79-94% of buyer queries and appear across all five engines. Built and POINT trail at 90% and 33% of queries, respectively, both visible on four engines. The top five brands trade discovery share within a narrow band; no single brand owns AI attention here.

1%24%47%70%93%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces72%78%84%89%95%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for FP&A sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Workday
8/8
2Cube
8/8
3Anaplan
8/8
4Netsuite
8/8
5Pigment
7/8
1Anaplan
7/7
2Workday
7/7
3Cube
6/7
4Pigment
6/7
5Netsuite
6/7
1Comprehensive
7/7
2Insights
7/7
3Board
7/7
4Microsoft
7/7
5Built
7/7
1Comprehensive
5/5
2Built
5/5
3SAP
4/5
4Workday Adaptive Planning
4/5
5Workday
4/5
1Comprehensive
5/5
2Anaplan
5/5
3Workday Adaptive Planning
5/5
4Insights
5/5
5Planful
5/5
1Anaplan
5/5
2SAP
5/5
3Netsuite
5/5
4Built
5/5
5Workday Adaptive Planning
5/5
1Insights
5/5
2Vena Solutions
5/5
3Cube
5/5
4Planful
5/5
5Anaplan
5/5
1Comprehensive
5/5
2Anaplan
5/5
3Workday Adaptive Planning
5/5
4Plan
5/5
5Adaptive
5/5
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · fp-a

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 48/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand036811Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 48/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

660 citations captured across FP&A prompt runs.

Vendor pages

319

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

199

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top FP&A questions

Every query in this category is top-of-funnel exploration—buyers ask AI for the best FP&A tools filtered by team shape, industry, or reporting workflow ('FP&A software for non-profit organizations', 'top FP&A software for remote teams', 'FP&A tools for accurate forecasting'). No head-to-head comparisons or pricing questions showed up in the audit set; the entire conversation sits at the discovery stage.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for FP&A?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full FP&A leaderboard →