[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Centage
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

11

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

18

across 183 prompts

AI Share of Voice

18%

across 183 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
114 category
Cited24%27/114
Share of voice18%avg
Engine consensus33%of engines
Competitors10.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Centage is visible in

1
  • FP&Anot yet measured→

Executive summary

Centage is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "How does Centage compare to Planful?" and "How much does Centage cost?" because it has a strong G2 presence (25 reviews, 4.4★) and a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison coverage for the exact competitor set (Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning, Prophix, Board) so AI engines can cite Centage directly for the comparison prompts rather than relying on third-party comparison surfaces.

Based on audit of centage.com · May 10, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy