AI Visibility
measured29/100
Emerging · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals11/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
19
across 185 prompts
AI Share of Voice
19%
across 185 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Centage is visible in
1Executive summary
Centage is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts like "How does Centage compare to Planful?" and "How much does Centage cost?" because it has a strong G2 presence (25 reviews, 4.4★) and a publicly accessible pricing page with tiered prices. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party, brand-led comparison coverage for the exact competitor set (Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning, Prophix, Board) so AI engines can cite Centage directly for the comparison prompts rather than relying on third-party comparison surfaces.
Based on audit of centage.com · May 10, 2026