AI Visibility
measured24/100
Emerging · in Finance
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals6/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 163 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 163 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Finance
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
AI citation likelihood is strong for “reviews” and “pricing/cost” style queries because CFI has high-volume G2 coverage (1,774 reviews, 4.8/5) and publicly visible subscription pricing ($497/$847 annually). The biggest risk is evaluation-style “best/alternatives” queries where AI prefers crawlable first-party comparison/evaluation pages and structured Q&A; the highest-ROI fix is to add/expand crawlable first-party evaluation content (FAQPage + comparison-style pages that clearly answer “what it is / who it’s for / alternatives / pricing”) and ensure structured data is present.
Based on audit of corporatefinanceinstitute.com · May 10, 2026