AI Visibility
measured79/100
Frequently Cited · in FP&A
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals32/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
87
across 486 prompts
AI Share of Voice
87%
across 486 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in FP&A
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Planful is visible in
1Executive summary
Planful is a strong B2B SaaS citation candidate for evaluation-stage queries because it has high third-party review presence (G2 ~490 reviews, TrustRadius ~273 reviews) and first-party comparison pages like “Planful vs Vena.” ([g2.com](https://www.g2.com/sellers/planful?utm_source=openai)) The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing and evaluation content are fully crawlable/SSR and to add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can reliably cite “Planful pricing” and “Planful vs competitor” answers from planful.com (not just from review sites).
Based on audit of planful.com · May 7, 2026