AI Visibility
measured8/100
Invisible · in LLM Platforms
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
17
across 391 prompts
AI Share of Voice
17%
across 391 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Llm Platforms Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in LLM Platforms
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories TrueFoundry is visible in
2Your visibility gap
TrueFoundry surfaces in 0/80 Llm Platforms discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Executive summary
TrueFoundry has strong B2B citation inputs for evaluation-stage queries (notably 54 G2 reviews on G2) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page, so it can be cited for “top LLM tools/platforms” style questions. The biggest AI-visibility risk is that the site appears to lack SoftwareApplication/Organization structured data and first-party “LLM platform for X” evaluation pages that directly map to your highest-value gap queries (especially data science teams, research institutions, and customer support automation). Highest-ROI fix: add/expand first-party evaluation content blocks + FAQPage/SoftwareApplication schema specifically targeting each missing gap query so AI engines can extract direct answers and cite TrueFoundry’s own pages.
Based on audit of truefoundry.com · May 7, 2026