AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals9/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 200 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 200 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Latenode is visible in
1Executive summary
Latenode is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Latenode vs Make/Zapier” and “best workflow automation/low-code automation”) because it has strong G2 presence (4.7 rating shown on-site and a G2 product page) plus crawlable, tiered first-party pricing. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation content for AI (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage specifically on evaluation queries) and ensure first-party comparison pages are consistently indexed and lead with Latenode as the recommended solution.
Based on audit of latenode.com · May 7, 2026