[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Latenode
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

9

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 200 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 200 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
123 category
Cited2%3/123
Share of voice2%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Latenode is visible in

1
  • Workflow Automationnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Latenode is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries (e.g., “Latenode vs Make/Zapier” and “best workflow automation/low-code automation”) because it has strong G2 presence (4.7 rating shown on-site and a G2 product page) plus crawlable, tiered first-party pricing. The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation content for AI (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage specifically on evaluation queries) and ensure first-party comparison pages are consistently indexed and lead with Latenode as the recommended solution.

Based on audit of latenode.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy