[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Redis
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

99

across 447 prompts

AI Share of Voice

100%

across 431 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
290 category
Cited100%290/290
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited83%5/6
Share of voice83%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Executive summary

redis.io is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., TrustRadius shows 231 reviews) and enterprise analyst/peer signals (Gartner Peer Insights vendor page exists). The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage evaluation queries that require crawlable, structured pricing and first-party evaluation content (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/price schema and robust “[Redis] pricing” extraction).

Based on audit of redis.io · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy