Out nowThe Citation EconomyBuy on Amazon →

Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Feedback Management

Feedback management is a duopoly at the top with fragmentation below. Qualtrics XM Platform and Medallia surface across every engine in the majority of discovery queries — Qualtrics at 68%, Medallia at 57% — but Medallia wins more head-to-heads when buyers ask AI to compare. Typeform, Canny, Pendo, and Intercom split the next tier within five percentage points of each other, each visible on all engines but none cracking 44% of discovery prompts. The category is contested: two brands own the top of the shortlist, but no single brand dominates both discovery and evaluation.

174 discovery queries · 233 head-to-heads · refreshed Aug 16, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 174 buyer-style "Feedback Management" queries

Qualtrics XM Platform and Medallia are the only brands that surface in more than half of buyer queries about feedback management — Qualtrics at 68%, Medallia at 57%, both visible across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Typeform, Canny, Pendo, Intercom, UserVoice, and Reputation cluster between 44% and 29%, each appearing on all three engines but without the citation density of the top two. Productboard and Hotjar round out the shortlist below 30%, present on every engine but trailing in raw mention volume.

23%36%48%61%74%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces63%69%74%80%86%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Feedback Management sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Qualtrics
7/7
2Driven
6/7
3Medallia
6/7
4Delighted
5/7
5Pendo
4/7
1Medallia
6/6
2Qualtrics
6/6
3Typeform
6/6
4Delighted
4/6
5Reputation
4/6
1Delighted
5/5
2Intercom
5/5
3Typeform
5/5
4Canny
5/5
5Productboard
5/5
1Canny
5/5
2Productboard
5/5
3Qualtrics
4/5
4Medallia
4/5
5Typeform
4/5
1Qualtrics
4/4
2Qualitative
4/4
3Panorama Education
3/4
4Microsoft
3/4
5ThoughtExchange
3/4
1Medallia
4/4
2Qualtrics
4/4
3AskNicely
4/4
4Delighted
3/4
5Typeform
3/4
1Medallia
4/4
2Qualtrics
4/4
3Yotpo
4/4
4Delighted
4/4
5Reputation
4/4
1Qualtrics
4/4
2Microsoft
4/4
3Medallia
3/4
4Typeform
2/4
5Blackbaud
2/4
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · feedback-management

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 5/100

When buyers ask AI to compare feedback management tools head-to-head, Qualtrics and Medallia trade wins at the top — Qualtrics scores 44 across 25 comparisons, Medallia scores 42 across 24. Intercom matches Medallia's 42 score but shows up in the same number of head-to-head matchups. Canny, Productboard, and Pendo cluster in the mid-thirties, each appearing in roughly 20 comparison queries, while Delighted and UserVoice land in the low-thirties.

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand06131925Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 5/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Feedback Management?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Feedback Management leaderboard →