Subcategory · AI Citation Index

Audit & SOX

The audit and SOX compliance category shows moderate concentration at the top but significant fragmentation below, with AuditBoard and Workiva each appearing on roughly half of shortlists while achieving maximum model diversity (4). The 41-percentage-point gap between the leader and the fifth-ranked brand (ServiceNow at 39%) suggests buyers differentiate strongly on specialized audit capabilities versus general GRC platforms. With 53 consensus brands and only 12 evaluated brands, most selection activity occurs at the awareness and shortlist stages, indicating buyers rely heavily on category reputation and peer recommendations before deep evaluation.

161 discovery queries · 318 head-to-heads · refreshed Jul 13, 2026

Discovery stage

The shortlist

Across 161 buyer-style "Audit & SOX" queries

5%13%22%30%38%Coverage — share of discovery prompts where the brand surfaces63%69%76%83%89%Engine diversity

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = coverage across discovery prompts · Y = engine diversity · Bubble size = total mentions
Tracked acrossChatGPT,Gemini,Claude

Get weekly AI visibility changes for Audit & SOX sent to your inbox.

Score shifts, new entrants, citation gaps — every Monday.

Signal by intent

By topic

Top 5 most-cited brands per intent cluster. Brands with zero citations in a topic are not shown.

1Workiva
4/5
2Diligent
4/5
3AuditBoard
3/5
4Netsuite
3/5
5Sphera
3/5
1AuditBoard
4/4
2Workiva
4/4
3Diligent
4/4
4MetricStream
3/4
5LogicGate
2/4
1AuditBoard
4/4
2Diligent
4/4
3Workiva
4/4
4ServiceNow
4/4
5MetricStream
4/4
1Comprehensive
4/4
2Internal
3/4
3AuditBoard
3/4
4Board
3/4
5ETQ Reliance
3/4
1AuditBoard
3/3
2Workiva
3/3
3SAI360
2/3
4Diligent
2/3
5LogicGate
2/3
1Workiva
3/3
2AuditBoard
3/3
3Diligent
3/3
4LogicGate
2/3
5StandardFusion
1/3
1Vanta
3/3
2AuditBoard
2/3
3Diligent
2/3
4LogicGate
2/3
5Drata
2/3
1AuditBoard
3/3
2Workiva
3/3
3Diligent
3/3
4Vanta
2/3
5Drata
2/3
≥50% cited
25–49%
<25%
Topics are discovery-stage prompt clusters · audit-management

Evaluation stage

Head-to-head

How often AI cites each brand across uniform category evaluation prompts · median 8/100

0255075100Evaluation citation rate — % of category evaluation prompts citing this brand07152229Evaluation prompts cited inmedian citation ratemedian exposure

Hover or click a logo to see brand details

X = evaluation citation rate · Y = evaluation prompts cited in · Bubble size = citation exposure
Median citation rate 8/100

Each brand's score is the share of category evaluation prompts where AI cited them across all four engines — the same prompt pool for every brand. Brands above the median citation rate have stronger presence in evaluation-stage queries.

Citation sources

Where AI pulls citations from

862 citations captured across Audit & SOX prompt runs.

Vendor pages

363

Product, help, and marketing pages from tracked vendors

Independent sources

145

Reviews, encyclopedias, forums, press — not vendor-owned

Buyer questions

What AI cites for top Audit & SOX questions

Most-cited prompts across the buyer journey. Click any prompt to see the actual URLs AI engines link to.

Discovery

Buyers exploring the category

Evaluation

Buyers comparing options

Want to know if AI cites your brand for Audit & SOX?

Free audit. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude.

Run an audit →

See the full Audit & SOX leaderboard →