[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Comp AI
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

0

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 325 prompts

AI Share of Voice

12%

across 325 prompts

Critical Issues

6

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
190 category
Cited11%21/190
Share of voice11%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited75%3/4
Share of voice67%avg
Engine consensus89%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice92%avg
Engine consensus92%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Comp AI is visible in

3
  • Governance, Risk & Compliancenot yet measured→
  • Revenue Operationsnot yet measured→
  • Sales Intelligencenot yet measured→

Executive summary

Comp AI (trycomp.ai) is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a sizable G2 presence (56 reviews, 4.6★) in the Security Compliance category. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation pages that explicitly cover the exact competitor set (Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe, Delve) and the exact evaluation prompts—so AI engines can cite Comp AI directly for “best security compliance software” and “Comp AI vs Vanta/Drata” style questions.

Based on audit of trycomp.ai · Jun 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy