AI Visibility
measured33/100
Emerging · in AI Applications
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals57/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
12
across 326 prompts
AI Share of Voice
12%
across 326 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in AI Applications
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Comp AI is visible in
3Executive summary
Comp AI (trycomp.ai) is already strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a sizable G2 presence (56 reviews, 4.6★) in the Security Compliance category. The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen first-party, brand-led comparison and evaluation pages that explicitly cover the exact competitor set (Vanta, Drata, Sprinto, Secureframe, Delve) and the exact evaluation prompts—so AI engines can cite Comp AI directly for “best security compliance software” and “Comp AI vs Vanta/Drata” style questions.
Based on audit of trycomp.ai · Jun 5, 2026