[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Workiva
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

58

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

87

across 609 prompts

AI Share of Voice

87%

across 593 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Audit & SOX · of 68

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
459 category
Cited94%433/459
Share of voice84%avg
Engine consensus56%of engines
Competitors7.1avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited57%4/7
Share of voice57%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.8avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Workiva is visible in

2
  • Audit & SOX2 of 68→
  • ESG & Sustainability3 of 66→

Executive summary

Workiva is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 2,141 G2 reviews) and an active Gartner Peer Insights review page. The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation content for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and crawlable pricing/comparison surfaces), since pricing and schema crawlability signals appear weak from search results.

Based on audit of workiva.com · Jun 4, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy