AI Visibility
measured46/100
Frequently Cited
measured from this brand's audit prompts
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
10
across 160 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 144 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in its category
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured across this brand's own audit prompts (it isn't in a tracked category rollup yet). Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Workiva is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review presence (e.g., 2,141 G2 reviews) and an active Gartner Peer Insights review page. The single highest-ROI fix is to improve first-party evaluation content for AI (especially SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured Q&A and crawlable pricing/comparison surfaces), since pricing and schema crawlability signals appear weak from search results.
Based on audit of workiva.com · Jun 4, 2026