[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Diligent
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

53

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

82

across 639 prompts

AI Share of Voice

83%

across 623 prompts

Category Visibility

#19

in GRC Platforms · of 95

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
578 category
Cited91%524/578
Share of voice82%avg
Engine consensus48%of engines
Competitors4.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
9 brand-level
Cited78%7/9
Share of voice78%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors2.3avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited80%4/5
Share of voice80%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
5 brand-level
Cited40%2/5
Share of voice40%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors1.5avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Diligent is visible in

2
  • Audit & SOX10 of 71→
  • GRC Platforms18 of 95→

Executive summary

Diligent is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review/analyst signals (e.g., Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader announcement and active TrustRadius/G2 presence). The biggest AI-citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing + comparison” queries: the pricing page is a “request pricing” form (no public tiered prices), and there’s no evidence (from live checks) of first-party, brand-led “vs/alternatives” pages or crawlable SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data.

Based on audit of diligent.com · May 8, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy