[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Flosum
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

5

Limited Presence

Avg Prompt Score

5

across 286 prompts

AI Share of Voice

5%

across 286 prompts

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
165 brand-level
Cited0%0/165
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
4 brand-level
Cited100%4/4
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Flosum is visible in

2
  • CI/CDnot yet measured→
  • Version Controlnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Flosum is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (214 G2 reviews at 4.8) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Flosum vs Copado). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing and key evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and to add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can cite “pricing” and “vs” answers directly from flosum.com.

Based on audit of flosum.com · May 7, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy