AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in Audit & SOX
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals5/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 288 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 288 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Audit & SOX
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Flosum is visible in
2Executive summary
Flosum is very likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (214 G2 reviews at 4.8) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Flosum vs Copado). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure pricing and key evaluation pages are fully crawlable/SSR and to add/verify SoftwareApplication + FAQPage structured data so AI engines can cite “pricing” and “vs” answers directly from flosum.com.
Based on audit of flosum.com · May 7, 2026