Other products from Microsoft
AI Visibility
measured75/100
Frequently Cited · in Workflow Automation
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals21/100
Weak fundamentals
Avg Prompt Score
50
across 918 prompts
AI Share of Voice
50%
across 918 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Workflow Automation
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Power Automate is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has strong third-party review/analyst presence (e.g., Gartner Peer Insights shows 4.4 with 605 ratings, and TrustRadius has a dedicated reviews page). The single highest-ROI fix is to ensure first-party, crawlable evaluation content on this domain for comparison/pricing intent (first-party “[Power Automate] vs [Competitor]” and SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data), because current search signals show pricing and schema are more visible on Microsoft/learn.microsoft.com than on powerautomate.microsoft.com itself.
Based on audit of powerautomate.microsoft.com · May 5, 2026