Other products from Writer
AI Visibility
measured52/100
Frequently Cited · in Content Marketing
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
50
across 904 prompts
AI Share of Voice
50%
across 885 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Content Marketing
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
WRITER has strong B2B citation foundations via G2 (105 reviews, 4.3★) and meaningful enterprise-focused content (multiple customer stories with quantified outcomes). The biggest AI-citation risk is evaluation-stage query patterns that require first-party comparison and pricing evidence—live search did not surface first-party “WRITER vs Jasper/Grammarly” pages, and pricing appears to include “Contact sales” for Enterprise (reducing citeability for “How much does WRITER cost?”). Highest-ROI fix: publish/SSR-index first-party comparison pages for “How does WRITER compare to Jasper?” and “How does WRITER compare to Grammarly?” with self-contained answer blocks and add explicit public pricing tiers for all buyer segments.
Based on audit of writer.com · Apr 2, 2026