[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Wrike
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

13

across 2539 prompts

AI Share of Voice

13%

across 2521 prompts

Category Visibility

#8

in Task Management · of 182

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1769 category
Cited14%244/1769
Share of voice12%avg
Engine consensus41%of engines
Competitors6.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited82%9/11
Share of voice82%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Wrike is visible in

11
  • Resource Planning5 of 107→
  • Task Management6 of 87→
  • OKRs20 of 37→
  • Office & Productivity24 of 236→
  • Workflow Automation37 of 159→

Executive summary

Wrike is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 1,802 TrustRadius reviews) and a large LinkedIn presence (157,873 followers). The biggest remaining citation risk is first-party evaluation content: ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data is present and that pricing + comparison pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI can cite Wrike directly for “Wrike vs X” and “Wrike pricing” prompts.

Based on audit of wrike.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy