[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Wrike
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

12

across 2507 prompts

AI Share of Voice

11%

across 2489 prompts

Category Visibility

#8

in Task Management · of 86

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
1739 category
Cited12%214/1739
Share of voice11%avg
Engine consensus41%of engines
Competitors7.6avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
11 brand-level
Cited82%9/11
Share of voice82%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Wrike is visible in

11
  • Project Management Software7 of 119→
  • Task Management7 of 82→
  • Project Management8 of 41→
  • Resource Planning13 of 128→
  • Office & Productivity37 of 162→

Executive summary

Wrike is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 1,802 TrustRadius reviews) and a large LinkedIn presence (157,873 followers). The biggest remaining citation risk is first-party evaluation content: ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data is present and that pricing + comparison pages are fully crawlable/SSR so AI can cite Wrike directly for “Wrike vs X” and “Wrike pricing” prompts.

Based on audit of wrike.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy