AI Visibility
measured47/100
Frequently Cited · in Whiteboarding
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals63/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
15
across 797 prompts
AI Share of Voice
14%
across 775 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Whiteboarding
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Whimsical is visible in
4Executive summary
Whimsical is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage shortlist queries because it has 188 G2 reviews at 4.6/5. The biggest AI-citation risk is missing/weak structured evaluation surfaces on its own domain for the exact competitor-comparison prompts (e.g., no clearly indexed first-party pages for “How does Whimsical compare to Miro?” and “...to Mural?”), plus likely thin SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data for those specific query patterns. Highest-ROI fix: create/ensure first-party, crawlable comparison pages that explicitly answer “How does Whimsical compare to Miro?” and “How does Whimsical compare to Mural?” with self-contained answer blocks and matching FAQPage schema.
Based on audit of whimsical.com · Apr 2, 2026