[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Make
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

68

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

32

across 780 prompts

AI Share of Voice

33%

across 762 prompts

Category Visibility

#2

in Workflow Automation · of 203

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
469 category
Cited71%335/469
Share of voice41%avg
Engine consensus58%of engines
Competitors43.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
10 brand-level
Cited0%0/10
Share of voice0%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors—
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited20%1/5
Share of voice13%avg
Engine consensus67%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
6 brand-level
Cited33%2/6
Share of voice28%avg
Engine consensus83%of engines
Competitors5.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Make is visible in

4
  • Workflow Automation1 of 146→
  • AI Agents2 of 128→
  • Workflow Automation2 of 203→
  • ETL & Data Integration13 of 129→

Executive summary

Make is strongly positioned for AI citation on evaluation-stage queries because it has 273 G2 reviews at 4.6★ and first-party comparison content like “Make vs Zapier” and “Make vs Workato.” The biggest remaining risk is that high-intent competitor comparison prompts (e.g., “How does Make compare to MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?” / “Tray.io” / “Boomi”) may not be fully covered with first-party, brand-led pages for each competitor—so AI may cite competitors instead of Make.

Based on audit of make.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy