[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Culture Amp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

72

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

35

across 936 prompts

AI Share of Voice

34%

across 913 prompts

Category Visibility

#5

in Performance Management · of 92

Critical Issues

4

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
612 category
Cited50%308/612
Share of voice39%avg
Engine consensus55%of engines
Competitors19.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
13 brand-level
Cited77%10/13
Share of voice77%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.4avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
8 brand-level
Cited100%8/8
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
8 brand-level
Cited63%5/8
Share of voice63%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors3.0avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Culture Amp is visible in

4
  • Performance Management5 of 92→
  • HR14 of 132→
  • Survey Tools14 of 62→
  • Feedback Management37 of 179→

Executive summary

Culture Amp is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for employee engagement and performance evaluation queries because it has strong primary marketplace authority (1,535 G2 reviews at 4.5★) plus secondary B2B review presence (TrustRadius and Capterra) and first-party competitor-alternative landing pages. The biggest remaining citation risk is evaluation-stage query coverage that depends on crawlable, structured product/pricing data (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) and fully transparent pricing (their pricing page routes to “Contact sales” rather than showing tiers/prices).

Based on audit of culture-amp.com · Apr 2, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy