[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Culture Amp
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

63

Growing Presence

Avg Prompt Score

33

across 915 prompts

AI Share of Voice

33%

across 915 prompts

Category Visibility

#5

in Performance Management · of 187

Critical Issues

5

critical + high

Brand Accuracy

1/328

citations with inaccuracies

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
606 category
Cited50%302/606
Share of voice38%avg
Engine consensus56%of engines
Competitors20.1avg/cited
Sentimentpositive9+ / 0~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
6 brand-level
Cited100%6/6
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors0.8avg/cited
Sentimentpositive7+ / 11~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
7 brand-level
Cited100%7/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.4avg/cited
Sentimentpositive4+ / 8~ / 0−
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentimentneutral1+ / 11~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Culture Amp is visible in

4
  • Performance Management5 of 187→
  • HR14 of 278→
  • Survey Tools14 of 142→
  • Feedback Management37 of 288→

Executive summary

Culture Amp is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has very large G2 review volume (1,579 reviews) and an Enterprise Leader G2 badge signal. The biggest citation risk is conversion-stage and evaluation-stage “pricing/plan” queries: Culture Amp pricing appears to be quote-based (no self-serve public prices), which reduces the likelihood AI engines can cite pricing tiers from first-party pages.

Based on audit of culture-amp.com · Jul 6, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy