[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Airtable
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

21

across 1210 prompts

AI Share of Voice

21%

across 1210 prompts

Category Visibility

#24

in Task Management · of 121

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
738 category
Cited35%260/738
Share of voice27%avg
Engine consensus39%of engines
Competitors10.6avg/cited
Sentimentpositive6+ / 0~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
28 brand-level
Cited68%19/28
Share of voice59%avg
Engine consensus87%of engines
Competitors3.7avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 9~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus93%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive2+ / 1~ / 0−
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice96%avg
Engine consensus96%of engines
Competitors3.9avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Airtable is visible in

6
  • Workflow Automation19 of 268→
  • Task Management24 of 120→
  • Collaboration36 of 203→
  • Project Management Software39 of 177→
  • AI Agentsnot yet measured→

Executive summary

Airtable is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., Airtable vs Asana) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-seat pricing ($20/user/month Team; $45/user/month Business when billed annually). The biggest AI-citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not confirmed) plus missing/unclear llms.txt and potential secondary review/analyst coverage gaps beyond G2.

Based on audit of airtable.com · May 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy