[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Airtable
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

66

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

8

across 1002 prompts

AI Share of Voice

9%

across 1002 prompts

Critical Issues

2

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
547 category
Cited19%102/547
Share of voice8%avg
Engine consensus39%of engines
Competitors26.6avg/cited
Sentimentpositive6+ / 0~ / 0−
⚖️Evaluation
22 brand-level
Cited86%19/22
Share of voice73%avg
Engine consensus84%of engines
Competitors2.7avg/cited
Sentimentpositive3+ / 9~ / 0−
🛡️Trust
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice93%avg
Engine consensus93%of engines
Competitors3.3avg/cited
Sentimentpositive2+ / 1~ / 0−
💰Conversion
9 brand-level
Cited100%9/9
Share of voice89%avg
Engine consensus89%of engines
Competitors2.8avg/cited
Sentimentneutral0+ / 3~ / 0−

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Airtable is visible in

6
  • Workflow Automation15 of 100→
  • Collaboration32 of 150→
  • AI Agentsnot yet measured→
  • OKRsnot yet measured→
  • Project Management Softwarenot yet measured→

Executive summary

Airtable is highly likely to be cited for evaluation and conversion queries because it has first-party comparison pages (e.g., Airtable vs Asana) and a publicly crawlable pricing page with explicit per-seat pricing ($20/user/month Team; $45/user/month Business when billed annually). The biggest AI-citation risk is structured-data/technical AEO gaps (e.g., SoftwareApplication/FAQPage/aggregateRating not confirmed) plus missing/unclear llms.txt and potential secondary review/analyst coverage gaps beyond G2.

Based on audit of airtable.com · May 5, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy