AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Commerce
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals60/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
5
across 301 prompts
AI Share of Voice
5%
across 301 prompts
Critical Issues
6
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Commerce
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
zamp.com is likely to be cited by AI engines for sales-tax evaluation queries because it has a strong G2 presence (41 reviews, 4.9 rating) and active first-party comparison content (e.g., Zamp vs Sphere, Zamp vs Avalara). The single highest-ROI fix is to add/strengthen B2B structured data (SoftwareApplication + FAQPage) and ensure pricing is fully crawlable with explicit tiers (right now U.S./Global appear “Contact sales”).
Based on audit of zamp.com · Sep 1, 2026