AI Visibility
measured41/100
Frequently Cited · in Task Management
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals60/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
8
across 309 prompts
AI Share of Voice
8%
across 309 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Task Management
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories YOOBIC is visible in
2Executive summary
YOOBIC is strongly positioned for AI citation in evaluation-stage queries because it has a large G2 footprint (409 reviews, 4.6/5, Grid Leader) and first-party comparison pages (e.g., YOOBIC vs Axonify/Reflexis/WorkJam). The biggest conversion-stage gap is pricing: the YOOBIC pricing page is publicly crawlable but does not show tiered prices (it routes buyers to a call), which reduces AI engines’ ability to answer “how much does YOOBIC cost?” with first-party numbers.
Based on audit of yoobic.com · Oct 2, 2026