[unCited]
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
[unCited]/Webex
ProductCitation IndexAI InfluenceBlogBook
Claim profile →

AEO Score

71

Strong Presence

Avg Prompt Score

54

across 658 prompts

AI Share of Voice

54%

across 637 prompts

Category Visibility

#4

in Video Conferencing · of 58

Critical Issues

3

critical + high

Per-stage performance

🔍Discovery
350 category
Cited70%244/350
Share of voice59%avg
Engine consensus57%of engines
Competitors10.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
⚖️Evaluation
14 brand-level
Cited86%12/14
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.9avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
🛡️Trust
5 brand-level
Cited100%5/5
Share of voice100%avg
Engine consensus—
Competitors0.2avg/cited
Sentiment—no data
💰Conversion
7 brand-level
Cited86%6/7
Share of voice86%avg
Engine consensus100%of engines
Competitors1.7avg/cited
Sentiment—no data

Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.

Categories Webex is visible in

4
  • Video Conferencing4 of 58→
  • Meeting Tools7 of 87→
  • Team Messaging9 of 48→
  • Contact Center26 of 72→

Executive summary

Webex is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for “best video conferencing software” and “hybrid work” shortlist queries because it has very strong G2 presence (18,768 reviews, 4.2★) and visible secondary B2B review/enterprise signals (TrustRadius + Gartner Peer Insights). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen first-party evaluation content for the exact comparison prompts (e.g., “How does Webex compare to Zoom Workplace?”) with crawlable, brand-led “[Webex] vs [Zoom Workplace]” pages and FAQPage blocks—so AI can cite Webex directly instead of relying on third-party comparisons.

Based on audit of webex.com · Apr 1, 2026

Built for The Citation Economy