AI Visibility
measured22/100
Emerging · in Collaboration
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals59/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 310 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 310 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Collaboration
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Vevox is highly likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation-stage queries because it has strong third-party review authority (e.g., 462 reviews on G2 and ~4.8/5) and public, tiered pricing (e.g., Pro $19.96/$24.95 and annual $239.52). The biggest citation risk is Technical AEO: schema/AI-crawler directives (robots.txt/llms.txt) and structured-data signals (SoftwareApplication/FAQPage) could not be verified via live checks, which can reduce eligibility for Google AI Overviews and other rich-answer extraction.
Based on audit of vevox.com · Oct 2, 2026