AI Visibility
measured18/100
Emerging · in Forms & Surveys
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals58/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 320 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 320 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Forms & Surveys
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Typebot is visible in
2Executive summary
Typebot is already well-positioned to be cited for evaluation-stage queries because it has a meaningful G2 presence (42–44 reviews, ~4.6/5) and first-party comparison content (e.g., Chatfuel vs ManyChat pages that position Typebot). The single highest-ROI fix is to strengthen structured evaluation surfaces on typebot.io itself—specifically adding/confirming SoftwareApplication + pricing/FAQ evaluation schema and ensuring pricing/comparison content is fully crawlable/SSR so AI engines can cite it for “pricing” and “vs/alternatives” prompts.
Based on audit of typebot.io · Sep 1, 2026