AI Visibility
measured32/100
Emerging · in Live Chat
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals54/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
4
across 901 prompts
AI Share of Voice
4%
across 901 prompts
Critical Issues
5
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Ai Chatbots Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Live Chat
Composite = 60% coverage + 40% engine breadth, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Sendbird surfaces in 0/80 Ai Chatbots discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Sendbird has strong AI citation foundations for evaluation-stage queries (notably 124 G2 reviews at 4.6/5) and it publishes first-party head-to-head pages (e.g., Sendbird vs Stream) plus publicly visible pricing tiers. The biggest visibility risk for your highest-value discovery gaps (enterprise, marketing automation, user engagement, customer support teams, healthcare, and small business) is that Sendbird’s on-site content is not clearly packaged as “AI chatbot platforms” for those specific buyer intents—so AI engines don’t consistently shortlist it for those category/use-case discovery prompts.
Based on audit of sendbird.com · May 18, 2026