AI Visibility
measured62/100
Frequently Cited · in Sales Engagement
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals62/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
20
across 319 prompts
AI Share of Voice
18%
across 301 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Sales Engagement
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Reply is visible in
6Executive summary
Reply.io is highly likely to be cited for evaluation-stage prompts because it has strong G2 authority (1535 reviews, 4.6★, Leader badge) and publicly crawlable pricing. The biggest AI citation risk is comparison-query coverage: while Reply.io has competitor comparison content, there was no verifiable first-party “[Reply.io] vs Apollo.io/Outreach/lemlist/Salesloft” page structure surfaced in live search, so models may fall back to third-party sources for “How does Reply.io compare to …?” prompts.
Based on audit of reply.io · Apr 1, 2026