AI Visibility
measured25/100
Emerging · in Design
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals50/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
2
across 644 prompts
AI Share of Voice
2%
across 644 prompts
Critical Issues
4
critical + high
Shortlist Position
0/80
Not Visible · Developer Tools Discovery
How AI Visibility breaks down
in Design
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Your visibility gap
Plasmic surfaces in 0/80 Developer Tools discovery prompts. Claim this profile to see which 80 prompts you're missing and how to win them.
Plasmic has solid B2B citation anchors via G2 (4.6/5 from 12 reviews) and first-party pricing with explicit tiers (Free/Starter/Pro/Scale/Enterprise). The biggest AI-visibility gap is discovery-stage shortlist queries for “best developer tools for small businesses/startups/enterprise/remote teams” where Plasmic is not appearing (0/80 discovery prompts), so the highest-ROI fix is to publish crawlable, evaluation-ready category pages that directly answer those shortlist intents.
Based on audit of plasmic.app · Sep 1, 2026