AI Visibility
measured26/100
Emerging · in GPU Cloud
counts brand mentions in AI answers, not source citations
AEO Readiness
fundamentals61/100
Some gaps
Avg Prompt Score
6
across 353 prompts
AI Share of Voice
6%
across 353 prompts
Critical Issues
3
critical + high
How AI Visibility breaks down
in GPU Cloud
Composite = 50% coverage + 30% engine breadth + 20% position, measured in the brand's strongest category. Position and citation depth join the score once the aggregation pipeline captures them. This is the measured Visibility score — separate from AEO Readiness, which scores fundamentals.
Per-stage performance
Cited rate · share of voice · engine consensus · sentiment, broken out by buyer-journey stage. Sentiment is the net positive−negative skew across engines that cited the brand at this stage.
Categories Parsec is visible in
3Executive summary
Parsec.app is likely to be cited by AI engines for evaluation and trust queries because it has a meaningful G2 presence (26 reviews) and a crawlable, tiered pricing page with per-user/month amounts. The biggest risk pattern is conversion-stage “Parsec pricing / cost” and evaluation-stage “Parsec vs [competitor]” where AI needs first-party, crawlable comparison/structured evaluation content; the highest-ROI fix is to add/expand first-party comparison pages and ensure SoftwareApplication/FAQPage structured data is present and crawlable.
Based on audit of parsec.app · Aug 31, 2026